Guest opinion: It’s past time for new approaches to address Indiana’s voter turnout problems

Submitted by Leigh Morris


Voter turnout is a concern across the country but it’s especially problematic in Indiana, where it has been lagging for years. It hit rock bottom in 2014 when, by many measures, Indiana had the lowest voter turnout of all the states. By the 2016 presidential elections there was improvement, but Indiana was still rated 38th out of the 50 states, with 55% of registered voters casting ballots. In the 2018 General Election, Indiana slipped even further to 40th of the 50 states with 49% of registered voters casting ballots.  

Why should that be?

I compared Indiana’s 2018 performance with the 10 other states that had the highest voter turnout to try to understand why Indiana’s performance has been fair to poor.


State % of  Registered Voters Voting Ranking Mail in Voting Same Day Registration Automatic Voter Registration
Minnesota 64.2 1 Since 1974
Colorado 63.0 2 Since 2013 Since 2014 Since 2017
Montana 62.0 3 Since 2006
Wisconsin 61.7 4 Since 1976
Oregon 61.5 5 Since 2000 Since 2015
Maine 60.2 6 Since 1973
Washington 58.9 7 Since 2011 Began in 2018
N. Dakota 58.6 8
Michigan 57.8 9 Begins in 2019
Iowa 57.7 10 Since 2008
Indiana 46.9 40

  Source:  U.S. Elections Project (Voter Participation Data)

The best analysis I’ve seen suggests that voter turnout is negatively influenced by three factors:

  1. Barriers to voter registration. Two solutions seem to have promise:
    1. Same-day registration. Four of the 10 highest-ranking states have same-day voter registration, which allows voters to register or fix a registration issue when they vote. States using same-day registration have averaged seven points higher in voter turnout than states without it.  Minnesota has been number one in turnout for 9 out of the last 10 presidential elections.
    2. Automatic Voter Registration. Oregon was the first state to automatically register eligible citizens who have driver’s licenses (except those who decline). The state has already seen significant registration increases since implementing the policy in January 2016. In 2017, Indiana took a rather tentative step toward encouraging voter registration by providing that when individuals transact business with a license branch (other than for a driver’s license, permit or identification card), they must be asked if they want to register to vote or change their voter registration record. If so, they are given a paper voter registration application form they must file with the county voter registration office.
  2. Inconvenience of Voting. Although early voting and relaxed requirements for absentee voting have provided alternatives to a requirement that voters accommodate to rigid voting schedules on election day, it appears that additional efforts might significantly improve turnout. Three states with the highest voter turnout—Oregon, Washington and Colorado—have adopted vote-by-mail approaches that have received high marks by voters and election administrators alike. Every registered voter receives their ballot 2 to 3 weeks prior to the election and may return it by mail or at a local drop box. Colorado also maintains vote centers for those who prefer to vote in person.
  3. Lack of Competitive Races. Joseph Losco, who heads the Bowen Center for Public Affairs at Ball State University, says the heart of Indiana’s poor voter turnout is the lack of competitive elections. In 2018, more than a quarter of the Indiana House and Senate races were uncontested in the general election. Two factors seem central to this issue:
    1. Gerrymandering, which results in legislative and congressional districts designed to protect incumbents rather than represent the electorate.
    2. Lack of qualified candidates, resulting in uncontested positions or landslide victories which suggest the futility of voting. Many qualified persons don’t seek office because of disdain for the negative partisanship and character assassination that is so often present, as well as the cost—both financial and personal–involved with candidacy.

Improving voter turnout in Indiana isn’t about altering the outcome of any specific election, or about helping any political party. We need to find better tools and methods to make the case that voting matters, even when it won’t change the outcome of an election.

We shouldn’t settle for Indiana being dead last in voter turnout (2014) or even 40th out of 50 states (2018). The General Assembly has been slow to address the problem, perhaps because of its complexity. A well-structured Summer Study Group might help get the ball moving. We shouldn’t wait another year!

— Leigh E. Morris

2 Responses to “Guest opinion: It’s past time for new approaches to address Indiana’s voter turnout problems”

  1. scott ford

    Mar 20. 2019

    Great article your dead on. Indiana continues decades old voter suppression strategies and gerrymandering to suppress participation. I wish move people on your side of the table felt the same way as you’ve professed. Thanks

    Reply to this comment
  2. Leigh Morris

    Mar 23. 2019

    Thanks, Scott. We can–and must–do better!

    Reply to this comment

Leave a Reply to scott ford